OSA Tools Project Management · NIWC Pacific
IMS Status Date Oct 1, 2026 · Snapshot S-39 · Navique Corporation
Navique Corporation · OSA Tools Project Management + NIWC Pacific

Our Proposal

We propose a governed AI coworker that continuously watches your Integrated Master Schedule, tells you what matters and why, prepares the work, and acts only when an authorized person says so.

A first AI implementation for the project — proposed around trust, human oversight, explainability, schedule integrity and auditability.

Where Cera stands today
Authority
Level 1
Pilot phase
2 · Observe
Recs accepted
91%
Unauthorized actions
0
Readiness for Level 2
72%

What we propose — and how Cera delivers

Each commitment links to the part of the product that delivers it.

01
Continuously observe the IMS
Know what changed every status cycle without manual comparison.
Snapshot-to-snapshot change detection across 11 change types, with impact and assessment.
Schedule Changes
02
Detect schedule-health issues
Surface logic, float, constraint and status-currency problems early.
DCMA-aligned health checks and evidence-backed findings with severity and confidence.
Cera Intelligence
03
Explain what matters
Plain explanations a PM can act on, with traceable evidence.
Every finding follows Observation → Evidence → Assessment → Impact → Recommendation.
Integrated Master Schedule
04
Protect milestones & dependencies
See exposure on Government-tracked milestones and external dependencies.
Milestone command view, dependency network and downstream cascade analysis.
Milestones
05
Draft work products
Reduce effort on variance narratives, briefs and status reports.
AI drafts are clearly labeled and go to the Approval Queue — never published automatically.
Daily Brief
06
Keep humans in authority
PM, scheduler and Government users retain all consequential decisions.
Explicit approval with reviewer, comment and confirmation; role-based permissions.
Approval Queue
07
Full traceability
Every AI and human action must be auditable.
Append-only audit trail with actor, authority, approval and evidence for every event.
Audit Trail
08
Prove value before expanding trust
Measurable performance and a safe, staged adoption path.
Live performance metrics, feedback loop and evidence-based authority readiness.
Cera Performance

Governance constraints we commit to

  • No unrestricted autonomous AI
  • No changes to the authoritative IMS without explicit approval
  • AI output must never look like an approved Government record
  • Authority is earned through validated performance
  • Start as a controlled 30-day pilot

Stakeholders in the room

Navique CorporationOSA Tools Project ManagerNIWC Pacific stakeholdersScheduling personnel

Cera observes, reasons, recommends and drafts. Humans decide. Cera executes only what is authorized — and everything is recorded.

Go to Implementation Discovery